Terminologia giuridica e organizzazione della conoscenza - metodo per la ricostruzione della struttura concettuale del diritto penale in ottica contrastiva
Parole chiave:
Criminal law, terminology, concepts, Italian, CzechAbstract
This contribution deals with the issue of comparing legal concepts of different legal systems in the field of criminal law, and aims to show how the preliminary reconstruction of conceptual relations within the systems under analysis is crucial to comparison, mainly in establishing the degree of conceptual equivalence—an aspect that is relevant to both legal professionals and translators of legal texts. Due to that, the study focuses on the area of criminal offences against property, as defined in two different legal systems: the Italian and the Czech one. Conceptual relations are implicitly present in texts, which are concrete evidence of the way in which professionals organize their knowledge. Maintaining a knowledge driven approach, the study proposes a comparison - oriented method of reconstruction of conceptual relationships.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Biel, Lucja. 2022. “Research into legal translation: an overview of the 2010 trends from the perspective of translation studies.” In Comparative Perspective on Law and Language, edited by A. Parise e O. Moréteau. Eleven.
Cornu, Gérard. 2005. Linguistique juridique – Le vocabulaire juridique. 3a ed. Montchrestien.
Estes, William K. 1994. Classification and cognition. Oxford University Press.
Garofoli, Roberto. 2022. Compendio di diritto penale, parte generale e speciale. Nel Diritto Editore.
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2010. Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford University Press.
Gémar, Jean–Claude. 2014. “Catching the spirit of Law: from translation to co-drafting.” In Comparative Law – engaging translation, edited by S.Glarent. Routledge.
Gémar, Jean-Claude. 2015. “De la traduction juridique à la jurilinguistique.” Meta 60 (3): 476–93.
Halford, Graeme S., William H. Wilson, Glenda Andrews, and Steven Phillips. 2014. Categorizing Cognition: Toward Conceptual Coherence in the Foundations of Psychology. MIT Press.
Jelínek, Jiří, Zdeněk Sovák, Antonín Draštík, et al. 2017. Trestní právo hmotné – obecná část, zvláštní část. 6a ed. Nakladatelství Leges.
L’Homme, Marie-Claude. 2020. Lexical semantics for terminology – An introduction. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Mauri, Caterina. 2021. “Ad hoc categorization in linguistic interaction.” In Building Categories in Interaction: Linguistic Resources at Work, edited by C. Mauri, et al. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Padovani, Tullio. 2023. Diritto penale. 10a ed. Giuffrè Editore.
Parise, Augustín. 2022. “Law and Language: a Plea for Experts Sans Frontières.” In Comparative Perspective on Law and Language, edited by A. Parise e O. Moréteau. Eleven.
Piergallini, Carlo. 2022. Reati contro il patrimonio, Giappichelli editore.
Sacco, Rodolfo. 2010. “Azione, pensiero, parola nella creazione del diritto.” In Lingua e diritto. Livelli di analisi, a cura di J. Visconti. LED.
Šámal, Pavel, Tomáš Gřivna, Lukáš Bohuslav, et al. 2022. Trestní právo Hmotné. 9a ed. Wolters Kluwer.
Šarčević, Susan. 1997. New approach to legal translation. Kluwer Law International.
Taylor, John R. 2004. Linguistic Categorization. Oxford University Press.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2025 Alessandra Bonsignori
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 Internazionale.
